Core Content Curriculum Standards - Science
By:
Kristen Angelastro, David Shellenhamer, Albert N. Moussab
Overarching Summary Statement – Science
The Core Content Curriculum Standards for Science can be broken down into three categories; skills, knowledge and dispositions. Science is based on facts, experiments and proof. The skills needed to accomplish these are; problem solving, decision making, inquiry skills, formulating usable questions, drawing conclusions, communicating results and mathematical applications. These skills will lead to the science knowledge needed for a student to become a well rounded citizen transferring their science knowledge into their everyday lives. This knowledge is the; history and development of science and technology, cultural impacts of science, understanding of the general characteristics of life, understanding the structure and behavior of matter (Chemistry), understanding basic laws of physics, understanding the dynamics of earth, understand the basic ideas of the universe and the basic knowledge of how humans affect the environment. This will give the learner the dispositions they need like remembering to recycle and changing their clothes as the seasons change based on their knowledge of science.
The principle and purpose:
Is to enhance student’s knowledge and skills in several areas;
Scientific Processes
Science and Society
Mathematical Applications
Nature and Process of Technology
Characteristics of Life
Chemistry
Physics
Earth Science
Astronomy and Space Science
Environmental Studies
The Overt Messages:
They are overwhelming, vague and difficult to understand. This will cause teaching to be very specified as to what the state wants.
They are not necessarily what is best for the students but, what the state is expecting from them. This causes teaching and learning to be geared to what an outside source is expecting and not the individual needs of students.
The Covert Messages:
They should be used as a guide to maximize the skills and knowledge that is best for your students.
Put them into your own words so they are understandable to you and make them into big ideas and essential questions to guide you.
Many of the standards repeat themselves and overlap. The instructor can then take what is essential and use that to guide their teaching, their students learning and the students will be gaining knowledge that is best suited to their abilities and needs.
Strengths
Students can apply the history of discoveries and events toward advancing science and technology. They examine groups from different points of view and interpret how their cultures contribute to advancement of the field.
Students are able to empathize and gain perspective into how social values and physical constraints can play a role in limiting the use of technology to solve problems.
Students are able to use the 6 facets of understanding in these parts of the CCCS.
Students can examine characteristics of life and apply them to real-world issues. Students can generate opinions, interpret the information and explain their conclusions based on the real-world information they have received.
Allows students to understand how conclusions are formed in science, and also gives them the capability to rationalize different problems in their own life and draw conclusions.
This can open up a number of opportunities for students to see their roles in society, and how their contributions to the class make up the environment in the classroom.
Weaknesses
No mention of Differentiation
Students who do not understand the “big idea” or part of the standard are left struggling because there is no alternative strategy or idea mentioned in CCCS.
Certain “Buzz” Words overused with no elaboration.
The words, “develop, problem solving, gain an understanding, observe and describe” are used often, without using specifics in how students are developing these understandings. Just observing and describing most likely will not lead to a greater understanding without using the 6 facets.
Many standards too big, and try to cover too many ideas.
Standard 5.1 for instance, has students developing and 3 different strategies (problem-solving, decision making, and inquiry skills), while formulating 7 different assessment strategies. This standard is so long and confusing that any teacher could interpret it differently.
Resources
American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://www.nj.gov/education/aps/njscp/Science_end_of_grade.pdf
Assistance & Recources Integrating Science Education; Science Lesson Resources for Lesson Design (1997-2008). Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://www.edusite.com/lesson.htm
Grade 3 Science Core Unit (1990, October) Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/elemsci/gr3ucesc.html
New Jersey Professional Education Port: Virtual Academy (2006). Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://www.nj.gov/education/njpep/classroom/classroom_resources/science/science_standards_resources_K_4.html
State of New Jersey, Department of Education (2006). Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://education.state.nj.us/cccs/?_standard_matrix;c=5
Science Netlinks, Benchmark Index (2008). Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://www.sciencenetlinks.com/benchmark_index.cfm
Wiggins, G.& McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.